🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states